Thursday, September 30, 2010

CFL bulb mercury bombs




Incandescent light bulbs consume too much energy. We need to conserve our resources. We need planet-friendly lighting.

But be careful with that CFL (Compact Fluorescent Light) bulb. It's a mercury bomb. If it shatters, keep your pets and children away from it, call a poison control center.

Walmart, Ikea, and other stores are no longer carrying any other kind of light bulb. All you can get are mercury bombs that can turn any breakage spot into a hazardous waste disaster.

Serious toxins in everybody's homes.

How can a difficult to recycle neurotoxin carrier be considered "green tech"?

Don't think you're safe as long you don't drop a CFL bulb.

Children and pets bump into things. Lamps fall. People fumble around as they work. BULBS BREAK.

How do you safely dispose of burnt out CFL bulbs?

What have we brought upon ourselves?

NPR warns us of CFL bulb dangers.


[QUOTE]

The Environmental Protection Agency and some large business, including Wal-Mart, are aggressively promoting the sale of compact fluorescent light bulbs as a way to save energy and fight global warming. They want Americans to buy many millions of them over the coming years.

But the bulbs contain small amounts of mercury, a neurotoxin, and the companies and federal government haven't come up with effective ways to get Americans to recycle them.

"The problem with the bulbs is that they'll break before they get to the landfill. They'll break in containers, or they'll break in a dumpster or they'll break in the trucks. Workers may be exposed to very high levels of mercury when that happens," says John Skinner, executive director of the Solid Waste Association of North America, the trade group for the people who handle trash and recycling.

Skinner says when bulbs break near homes, they can contaminate the soil.

Mercury is a potent neurotoxin, and it's especially dangerous for children and fetuses.

....


Experts agree that it's not easy for most people to recycle these bulbs. Even cities that have curbside recycling won't take the bulbs. So people have to take them to a hazardous-waste collection day or a special facility.

The head of the Environmental Protection Agency program concedes that not enough has been done to urge people to recycle CFL bulbs and make it easier for them to do so.


[END QUOTE]


According to Canada.com, in "The CFL Mercury Nightmare", we're in trouble.


[QUOTE]


How much money does it take to screw in a compact fluorescent light bulb?

About $4.28 for the bulb and labour -- unless you break the bulb.

Then you, like Brandy Bridges of Ellsworth, Maine, could be looking at a cost of about $2,004.28, which doesn't include the costs of frayed nerves and risks to health.

Sound crazy? Perhaps no more than the stampede to ban the incandescent light bulb in favour of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs).

According to an April 12 article in The Ellsworth American, Bridges had the misfortune of breaking a CFL during installation in her daughter's bedroom: It dropped and shattered on the carpeted floor.

Aware that CFLs contain potentially hazardous substances, Bridges called her local Home Depot for advice. The store told her that the CFL contained mercury and that she should call the Poison Control hotline, which in turn directed her to the Maine Department of Environmental Protection.

The DEP sent a specialist to Bridges' house to test for mercury contamination. The specialist found mercury levels in the bedroom in excess of six times the state's "safe" level for mercury contamination of 300 billionths of a gram per cubic meter.

The DEP specialist recommended that Bridges call an environmental cleanup firm, which reportedly gave her a "low-ball" estimate of US$2,000 to clean up the room. The room then was sealed off with plastic and Bridges began "gathering finances" to pay for the US$2,000 cleaning. Reportedly, her insurance company wouldn't cover the cleanup costs because mercury is a pollutant.

Given that the replacement of incandescent bulbs with CFLs in the average U.S. household is touted as saving as much as US$180 annually in energy costs -- and assuming that Bridges doesn't break any more CFLs -- it will take her more than 11 years to recoup the cleanup costs in the form of energy savings.
The potentially hazardous CFL is being pushed by companies such as Wal-Mart, which wants to sell 100 million CFLs at five times the cost of incandescent bulbs during 2007, and, surprisingly, environmentalists.

It's quite odd that environmentalists have embraced the CFL, which cannot now and will not in the foreseeable future be made without mercury. Given that there are about five billion light bulb sockets in North American households, we're looking at the possibility of creating billions of hazardous waste sites such as the Bridges' bedroom.

[END QUOTE]


You're going to drop a CFL bulb sometime in the future. Who has never broken a light bulb? It happens. What are we supposed to do when we have an accident? Are CFL light bulbs as good as they're promoted to be? How long do they typically last?

Is it green tech when the product saves energy...but adds to levels of toxicity?

CNN reported on the problems of CFL bulbs in the Eco Solutions article "Understanding Fluorescent Light Bulbs".


[QUOTE]

One person asking that question is City University of Hong Kong's professor Ron Hui, chairman of the electronic engineering department, and co-author of a recent paper published in a peer-reviewed journal on the environmental impact of fluorescent lighting.

Hui has a problem with compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs), specifically electronic ones. He wants them out of people's homes as much as an increasing number of governments around the world want incandescent light bulbs out of our homes. Hui wants them replaced by magnetic CFLs instead. Why?

CNN spoke recently with Professor Hui.

CNN: What is the problem with CFLs?

Professor Ron Hui: We support the idea of energy-efficient lamps but we have to tell the public about the consequences. The lifetime of electronic CFLs (eCFLs) is very limited; on average nine months and no more than one year.

Many have the misconception that energy saving equals being friendly to the environment. But to be environmentally friendly two factors must go hand in hand.

First, we must not pollute the atmosphere; and second we must not pollute the soil and the water. EFLs do save energy, but if the lifetime is, say, 10,000 hours, that's 1.1 years. And every year we throw these products in the garbage bin, so that's hundreds of millions a year.

CNN: What is the main problem with how we dispose of these CFLs?

Hui: The problem is, when you open an eCFL, you will see an electronic circuit.

On the printed circuit board we have a layer of anti-flame resistant coating made of PBDE -- this is highly toxic and in each lamp we have 3-5 milligrams of mercury.

The safe intake of mercury for a human body is a few micrograms. One milligram is 1,000 micrograms.

The problem is that eCFL is an integrated product. ... So the whole of it gets thrown away. And for the eCFL, you can't recycle it as you cannot reuse the used circuit board. And if you do recycle the tube, what about the e-waste? No one wants to talk about it.

[END QUOTE]


Here are the EPA recommendations for cleaning up CFL bulb breakage.


[QUOTE]

Before Cleanup: Air Out the Room

  • Have people and pets leave the room, and don't let anyone walk through the breakage area on their way out.
  • Open a window and leave the room for 15 minutes or more.
  • Shut off the central forced-air heating/air conditioning system, if you have one.

Cleanup Steps for Hard Surfaces

  • Carefully scoop up glass pieces and powder using stiff paper or cardboard and place them in a glass jar with metal lid (such as a canning jar) or in a sealed plastic bag.
  • Use sticky tape, such as duct tape, to pick up any remaining small glass fragments and powder.
  • Wipe the area clean with damp paper towels or disposable wet wipes. Place towels in the glass jar or plastic bag.
  • Do not use a vacuum or broom to clean up the broken bulb on hard surfaces.

Cleanup Steps for Carpeting or Rug

  • Carefully pick up glass fragments and place them in a glass jar with metal lid (such as a canning jar) or in a sealed plastic bag.
  • Use sticky tape, such as duct tape, to pick up any remaining small glass fragments and powder.
  • If vacuuming is needed after all visible materials are removed, vacuum the area where the bulb was broken.
  • Remove the vacuum bag (or empty and wipe the canister), and put the bag or vacuum debris in a sealed plastic bag.

[END QUOTE]



Another factor, in addition to mercury hazards and recycling problems, is price. According in Inhabitat "Despite dramatic energy savings, CFLs and LED bulbs have had a hard time carving out market share, even as their quality of light has improved, simply because they cost more at the checkout counter."

Many consumers are alarmed and seeking safe, energy-saving alternatives to the CFL bulb.







Further Reading


Inhabitat "IKEA Turns the Lights Out on Incandescent Bulb Sales"

EPA "Mercury Releases and Spills"

EPA "CFL Cleanup"

NPR "CFL Bulbs Have One Hitch: Toxic Mercury"

Eco Solutions "Understanding Fluorescent Light Bulbs"

CNET "CFL Bulb With Safety Skin Keeps Mercury Inside"

Natural Health News "CFL Lights: A Risky Change"

One Earth "Lightbulbs of the Future: Hate Those CFLs?"

Wikipedia "Compact Fluorescent Lamp"

Zero Mercury Global Campaign





Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Summer 2010 Photo Contest - Win $25



Submit your photo now to the Naturally Yours Photo Tree Summer Spree.

Send us your JPEG of a Central Illinois summer scene: your garden, a flower, pet, picnic, camping trip, fishing adventure, landscape work, or basket of organic fruit. Whatever says "summer" to you. Humor is a plus.

Dig up one of your best photos of this Summer 2010, from the Peoria, Bloomington-Normal, Central Illinois area.

Email the JPEG, or a link to where the photo is hosted (Blogger, Facebook, MySpace, flickr, etc.) to:

vaspers [at] inbox [dot] com

No photos of children please.

Winner in the opinion of the judges receives $25 Gift Certificate good at Naturally Yours Grocery in Peoria or Normal, IL. The winning photo may also be used in a new header for the Naturally Yours Photo Tree blog.

You must be a resident of Central Illinois to qualify.

Send us your photo today.










Let's see what you've got.



Healthy Eating Campaigns vs Obesity



The CDC says in reference to obesity "American society has become 'obesogenic,' characterized by environments that promote increased food intake, nonhealthful foods, and physical inactivity. Policy and environmental change initiatives that make healthy choices in nutrition and physical activity available, affordable, and easy will likely prove most effective in combating obesity."

Pity the poor glutton who sees far more propaganda urging him to Super Size It than to Eat Right. Once our bellies get stretched to accommodate larger portions, a vicious cycle kicks in. We eat more because we have a bigger hole to fill.

TV commercials are a good example of corporate irresponsibility.

How many car commercials have you seen that show people driving safely at moderate speeds? Almost none. The vast majority show drivers, with no other traffic or pedestrians around (an unnatural, uncommon condition), speeding and whipping around like lunatics. Car manufacturers convey what they consider "excitement" via acting out a death wish.

A similar thing occurs in food and restaurant commercials. Huge sandwiches, with triple bacon and cheese, are shoved in your face, with skinny people wolfing them down.

"I'm starving" has become a sick joke, a silly phrase that merely means "I haven't eaten for a few hours and my stomach is rumbling". It makes me cringe when I hear someone say "I'm starving", because it's a cruel mockery of people in poor areas who really are dying for lack of nourishment.

With all our excess fat, most Americans, and I include myself in this assessment, could probably survive for months without a meal. We are the Overfed. The USA is the only nation in the world where the poor people are obese. In all other countries, poor people are thin or emaciated, withering away. Americans are drowning in blubber.


I've noticed that every restaurant, especially fast food joints, dumps tons of salt on the french fries. We know that salt, sugar, and fat are killers. So why do they pour enormous piles of salt on the french fries? To make them taste better? It's insane.

Healthy eating campaigns aren't working. There are still too many movies, sitcoms, and commercials showing dainty glamorous (or thin regular people) chowing down on over-sized mounds of food.



Take a look at the graph above. It's not just Americans, though we lead in the over-consumption of frivolous goods and fatty foods.


Yes, the "Eat Healthy" campaigns are all dismal failures.

Why? Because ...

(1) they don't have enough celebrities in the ads

(2) peer pressure

(3) kids bossing their parents around and demanding Happy Meals

(4) junk food commercials continue to distort reality by showing skinny models eating huge sandwiches and salty fries

(5) TV food commercials appeal to the lower animal instincts, rather than reason and rationality

(6) Fast food restaurants supplanting local dietary culture in developing nations

(7) Worldwide emulation of the "fat happy American"

(8) Comfort food (fattening and sweet) increase in consumption due to bad economic policies and home foreclosures

(9) Failure of Hollywood to glamorize the ascetic, frugal, self-controlled individual

(10) Perception that fatty, salty, overly sweetened foods are somehow "patriotic" and "not weird like tofu"

(11) "Big is Better" myth (you must keep increasing the size of your income, family, online social network, home, car, land, etc.).



Further Reading



Eat Well

CDC Fruits and Veggies Matter

CDC Obesity and Overweight

CDC US Obesity Trends by State

NHS Choices

Obesity 2010 Conference

Jamie Oliver Food Revolution 

AJC "Campaign Encourages...Healthy Eating"

Australia "Go For 2 and 5 Campaign"

The Root "Michelle Obama's Healthy Food Campaign"





Monday, September 27, 2010

Make Your Own Bath Salts







Herbfest "How To Make Your Own Bath Salts"

I imported some giant jumbo acorns from a nearby forest to the squirrels in my backyard. They were a big hit. But from the frenzy of the nut burying, I wonder if a hard winter is ahead. Where's my hoody? Roasted marshmallows suddenly sound good. I heard my dog sneeze.

It's time to prepare for the cold and flu onset season. Get a head start by eating vitamin C enriched foods.

It also makes sense that a creature made of mud and water could be helped by minerals dissolving into water. There are a wide range of aromatic, therapeutic bath salts available, for kids and adults. You will find aromatic bath salts specifically targeted to colds and flu, muscle and joint pain, relaxation, and exhilaration.

[QUOTE]

Therapeutic baths are one form of hydrotherapy, which is a general term for the internal or external use of water for medical treatment.

Balneotherapy is the medical term for the use of baths or soaks to treat injuries or illnesses. It comes from the Latin word balneum , which means bath.

Balneotherapy has been used for thousands of years to treat skin disorders, arthritis, paralysis, gynecological disorders, and depression and other emotional problems. The remains of ancient baths have been found in the Indus Valley in India, and the Romans discovered mineral springs in various parts of Europe that are still used for balneotherapy.


Baths or soaks are an easy way to treat a variety of skin disorders involving large areas of the skin, injuries to or disorders of the muscles and joints, menstrual and menopausal discomfort, fatigue, or general stress and tension. They relieve general aches and pains and can ease dry or oily, inflamed or itchy skin. Hot baths are relaxing and stimulating; cool baths can reduce inflammation.

-- "Therapeutic Baths", Encyclopedia of Childrens Health

[END QUOTE]






You can simulate a health spa in your own home. Close the bathroom door, jump into the tub, and shut the shower door or curtain.

[QUOTE]

You may not always have the time to visit a resort or spa. There are several therapies you can enjoy at
home with little or no mess:

1. Thalassotherapy Bath: Draw a warm bath (37-400C) and add [mineral salt]. Dim the lights and soak for 20-30 minutes. Music will also add to the experience. Drink plenty of water durring and after your soak. Pat dry when finished and wrap in a warm bath robe. You'll feel relaxed and rejuvenated.

2. Salt Glow: You can purchase a favorite brand or create your own from scratch. Apply salt scub to dry skin. The shower is the perfect, easy to clean up, place for this. Be sure to massage entire body. The salts will exfoliate your skin allowing the nourishing essential oils to be absorbed. Once complete, turn on shower and rinse. Be careful not to slip as the oils can be slick. The result ~ soft and silky skin.

3. Crystal Potpourri: These scented salt crystals are a great way to enjoy aromatherapy benefits. In addition, the heated crystals cleanse the air. Breathing clear air will revitalize your spirit and help you to think more clearly.


-- "Bath Salt Therapy", SaltWorks

[END QUOTE]




Here's a video on how you can make your own bath salts.

Guys, aromatic organic bath salts are a fine gift for a lady.








Buy mineral salts at Naturally Yours Grocery online.

Buy bath products at Naturally Yours Grocery online.




Sunday, September 26, 2010

Win $25 by Guessing What This Photo Is


Guess What This Is -- 
Win $25.00 Right Now!


The first person to accurately guess what this plant is will win a $25.00 store gift certificate. This certificate will be good at both our Peoria and Normal, IL stores.

It's a plant that grows perenially in our square herb garden, as we call it. (We have so many gardens, we give them simple, caveman names.) It starts as a fern, then those yellow blossoms appear in late summer/early autumn. The ferns, especially now, have a strong, semi-sweet, pungent woodsy fragrance, similar to mothballs in intensity. It's not a bad smell, but it's not floral or delicate.

If you think you know what it is, post a comment, or send an email to Steven Streight at:

vaspers [at] inbox [dot] com


Good luck!

But wait!

There's more!

Act now, with your mobile device or camera phone, and win an extra $25.00!


Special Mobile-Only 
BONUS Photo

Scan the QR code below for an additional photo contest just for mobile web surfers.

Same rules apply. Scan the image, see the photo, then post a comment here, or email me, telling me what you think it is. First person to be correct wins a $25.00 store gift certificate.

Get on it now. And again...may fortune shine upon you.



Scan to see BONUS
**mobile only**
$25.00 contest
PHOTO.



QUALIFICATION: To win these prizes, you must live in the Peoria, Bloomington/Normal, Central Illinois area, because the gift certificates are good only in our Peoria and Normal stores.



Saturday, September 25, 2010

Burts Bees Story on CNN



brianr3123 "Burts Bees Story"






Buy Burts Bees products at Naturally Yours Grocery online.




Good Example of Organic Product User Reviews VIDEO



HollyofMirkWood2 "Some Reviews of Organic Products"

This video is a great example of a genuine User Review. Holly is sincere, spontaneous, authentic, transparent, and charming. Good information here on evaluating organic products.

In this segment, she reviews some cosmetic and hair care products.

Delightful.


NASA Touches the Sun





Jimi Hendrix sang "Excuse me while I kiss the sky" in the song Purple Haze.

Soon NASA hopes to croon "Excuse me while I caress the sun."

They're planning to actually touch it. Humans, through technological extension in the form of NASA's Solar Probe Plus, will actually fly toward the sun, come excruciatingly close to it, and scoop up some gases.

It's almost like a man setting his foot on the moon, this reaching out with a robotic arm to snag some sun atmosphere.

Sun gas. Petting the sun as though it were a kitten. Imagine that.





[QUOTE]

When NASA’s Solar Probe Plus (SPP) launches before the end of the decade, it will carry a suite of cutting-edge scientific instruments. Only one – the Solar Wind Electrons Alphas and Protons (SWEAP) Investigation – will directly sample the Sun’s outer atmosphere. Designed by scientists at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA), part of SWEAP will extend beyond the probe’s heat shield to scoop up some of the Sun’s tenuous gases.

“While the other instruments are hidden, we’ll be right out there getting blasted by the Sun, literally “touching” a star for the first time,” said Justin Kasper, SWEAP principal investigator and Smithsonian astronomer.

....


...swooping to within four million miles.

At closest approach, the Sun will appear more than 20 times wider than it does on Earth, stretching across more than 10 degrees of the sky.

It will bathe SPP in 500 times more light than we see on Earth. As a result, the probe will have to withstand temperatures exceeding 2,550 degrees Fahrenheit, as well as blasts of radiation and particles. A revolutionary carbon-composite heat shield will protect the spacecraft.


SPP will plunge through the Sun’s outer atmosphere not once but repeatedly. In order to be able to observe the atmosphere under all conditions, the SWEAP Solar Probe Cup will look around the heat shield directly at the Sun.

The SWEAP Solar Probe Analyzers will sit in the shadow on either side of the heat shield and make detailed measurements of the atmosphere flowing around the heat shield. On each dive, SWEAP will scoop up the main components of the corona and solar wind and determine quantities such as their speed, temperature, and relative abundance.


-- Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

"CfA Will Play Major Role in Mission to Touch the Sun".



[END QUOTE]






Friday, September 24, 2010

FDA stupidity in approving GM salmon




You don't have the right to know what you're eating.

You should just eat whatever you find in the grocery store, and not question it. It it's there, it's okay. Shut up and buy and ... eat.

At least that's what the FDA seems to think. They're bowing to political pressures from the Freak Food Industry, the Genetically Modified Crew, to not impose mandatory labeling.

The FDA knows that if food has a "Genetically Modified" label on it, most people won't buy it. So they'd rather twist the facts and let GM food producers use false, misleading labels like "Environmentally Friendly" based on biased and limited research.

We tackled this topic earlier, in "Salmon May Be First Genetically Modified Food for Humans"

Worse yet, the FDA is making it increasingly difficult for non-GM salmon to be labeled "Not Genetically Engineered" or "Hormone Free". Thanks a lot, FDA. Whose interests are you really serving? I think we all know the dismal answer to that question.

Many experts predict that GM fish will escape from the fish farms, infiltrate the streams where normal salmon hang out, and being larger and more aggressive, take over their territory. Eventually, normal natural salmon will succumb to the Darwinian law of survival of the fittest. They'll become extinct.





According to Food Chemical News, "Speakers chosen to make presentations to FDA’s hearing on labeling of Aqua Bounty’s transgenic salmon this morning rejected mandatory labeling of the food product, citing lack of 'material' differences between AquaAdvantage salmon and conventional Atlantic salmon."

The Washington Post "FDA Rules Won't Require Salmon Labels" states:

[QUOTE]

"The public wants to know and the public has a right to know," said Marion Nestle, a professor in the Nutrition, Food Studies and Public Health Department at New York University. "I think the agency has discretion, but it's under enormous political pressure to approve [the salmon] without labeling."

The debate will be taken up this week, with an advisory committee meeting Sunday and Monday on whether to allow the modified fish, and a separate panel meeting Tuesday on whether the fish should be labeled. The panels will offer recommendations to the FDA commissioner, who will decide both matters.

The biotechnology industry is opposed to mandatory labeling, saying it will only bewilder a public that is not well informed about genetic engineering.

"Extra labeling only confuses the consumer," said David Edwards, director of animal biotechnology at the Biotechnology Industry Organization. "It differentiates products that are not different. As we stick more labels on products that don't really tell us anything more, it makes it harder for consumers to make their choices."




The FDA defends its approach, saying it is simply following the law, which prohibits misleading labels on food. And the fact that a food, in this case salmon, is produced through a different process, is not sufficient to require a label.

The controversy comes at a time when Americans seem to want to know more about their food - where it is grown, how it is produced and what it contains. Books criticizing industrial agriculture have become bestsellers, farmers markets are expanding and organic food is among the fastest-growing segments of the food industry.

The FDA itself is part of a new effort to improve nutrition information on processed foods.


In the European Union and Japan, it is nearly impossible to find genetically modified foods, largely because laws require labeling, said William K. Hallman, director of the Food Policy Institute at Rutgers University. "No one wants to carry products with such a label," he said. "The food companies figure that consumers won't buy it."

There is nothing to stop salmon producers or food makers in the United States from voluntarily labeling their products as genetically engineered - except a fear of rejection in the marketplace, Hallman said. "I don't know of a single company that does that," he said.

The FDA maintains it can only require labeling if a genetically engineered food is somehow different from the conventional version - if it has an unusual texture, taste, nutritional component or allergen, for example.

Although some consumer advocates maintain there are important differences, the agency's scientists have already said they see no "biologically relevant" variations between the AquAdvantage salmon and traditional salmon.

Consumers could be certain of getting the non-modified version if they bought salmon labeled as "wild," but most salmon consumed in this country is farmed.

Ever since the FDA approved the first genetically altered material for use in food in 1992, when Monsanto developed a synthetic hormone injected into cows to increase milk production, the agency has held that it cannot require food producers to label products as genetically engineered.

In the intervening years, the use of genetically engineered crops has skyrocketed; 93 percent of this year's soybean crop is genetically engineered, according to the U.S. Agriculture Department.

One state with a sizable salmon fishing industry - Alaska - passed a law in 2005 that requires labeling of any genetically engineered fish sold there.

[END QUOTE]

Jill Richardson at Grist makes the finer scientific, and political, points clear in her article "Why Is the FDA About to Rubber Stamp GE Salmon?"


[QUOTE]

After working with AquaBounty since the mid-1990's on the application for the GE salmon, the FDA has only just recently released 255 pages of technical information -- and then allowed a mere 14 days for the public to comment on it. And there is something decidedly fishy about the makeup of the committee chosen to weigh the scientific risk assessments. One might say that the scales are heavily weighted in favor of pro-biotech interests.


The FDA is regulating the GE salmon as a "New Animal Drug," in agency terminology, and it is thus being evaluated by a special Veterinary Medicine Advisory Committee (VMAC) meeting today and yesterday.

Consumers Union, the nonprofit watchdog group and publisher of Consumer Reports, has written a letter to the FDA and formally submitted comments protesting aspects of this approval process, from the shortened time frame, committee makeup, and data rigor (or lack of it).

In the latest twist, the GE salmon data was taken from a small sample of fish raised in a facility in Prince Edward Island, whereas AquaBounty actually plans to raise the fish in Panama; thus, approving the fish based on the current data actually represents a violation of the law.

So, given the significance of the GE salmon's approval process to the future of the U.S. food supply, why is the FDA all of a sudden in such a rush to approve the salmon that the public can only have 14 days to submit comments?

A more standard public comment period would be 60 or 90 days. As Consumers Union points out, the GE salmon is not a life-saving medical technology that is urgently needed on the market.

The only harm that could come from allowing the public 60 days to weigh in on the GE salmon is that AquaBounty will wait a few extra months to cash in. And perhaps independent scientists could raise difficult questions about the GE salmon's safety that would make it harder to ram through its approval.

[END QUOTE]




Thursday, September 23, 2010

Make Your Own Organic Lip Balm VIDEO



Glamology "How to Make Organic Lip Balm"

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Save money on baked goods COUPON



HOW TO PRINT
THIS COUPON:



Click on the coupon image.

Now all you see in your web browser is the coupon, instead of this post.

Set your computer functionality to Print.

Print the page.

Bring it to Naturally Yours Grocery in Peoria or Normal.



Save money on health books COUPON



HOW TO PRINT
THIS COUPON:



Click on the coupon image.

Now all you see in your web browser is the coupon, instead of this post.

Set your computer functionality to Print.

Print the page.

Bring it to Naturally Yours Grocery in either Peoria or Normal.



Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Sept 2010 Updates on BP Gulf Oil Spill



While some may have lost interest in the BP Gulf Oil Spill, assuming the leak is plugged, the seafood is safe, and the whole problem is solved, we should not be so self-centered or foolish. This situation is still troublesome, and there's no use sweeping it under the rug.

My personal opinion is that the Gulf of Mexico seafood is unsafe and unfit for human or animal consumption. You may come to a different conclusion, but we must be well informed and try to sort through the conflicting stories and research.





Here are some of the latest information online concerning this enormous and far-reaching tragedy.


National Park Service Response to BP Gulf Oil Spill

Department of the Interior "Deepwater Horizon Response"

Restore The Gulf.gov

Wikipedia "Deep Water Horizon Oil Spill"

Who Runs Gov "BP Oil Spill"

NY Times "Oil Spills"

NOAA "Deepwater Horizon/BP Oil Spill: Federal Fisheries Closure and Other Info"

Miami Herald "Doctors Fear Gulf Oil Spill Still a Threat to Seafood Safety"

Nola.com "Oil Spill Gulf of Mexico 2010 Updates"

Huffington Post "Gulf Oil Spill Updates"

AJC "Officials, Chefs Tout Gulf Seafood Safety"

Politics Daily "Sealing of BP Oil Well Doesn't Eliminate Questions and Anxiety"

WWLTV.com "Scientists Question Thoroughness of Gulf Seafood Testing"

Charity Vault "Greenpeace Gulf Investigation Continues, Looks at Effects of BP Oil Spill on Aquatic Life"

Newser "News About: Gulf Oil Spill"

The Stuart Smith Blog (New Orleans attorney) "Gulf Oil Spill: Tracking the Claims"

Center for Media Innovation and Research "Dark Tide: The Gulf Oil Spill"








Monday, September 20, 2010

Organic Consumers Association




The Organic Consumers Association is a great resource for information on organic food and organic activism.

Among their OCA Campaigns:


USDA Watch

Millions Against Monsanto

Coming Clean

SOS: Safeguard Organic Standards

Breaking the Chains: Buy Local

Appetite for a Change: Reducing Pesticides and Junk Food for Children

Stop Toxic Sludge

Planting Peace


Their latest blog post is "OCA Testimony to the FDA Concerning Genetically Modified Salmon."


From their About Us page:


[QUOTE]

Consumers Association (OCA) is an online and grassroots non-profit 501(c)3 public interest organization campaigning for health, justice, and sustainability.

The OCA deals with crucial issues of food safety, industrial agriculture, genetic engineering, children's health, corporate accountability, Fair Trade, environmental sustainability and other key topics. We are the only organization in the US focused exclusively on promoting the views and interests of the nation's estimated 50 million organic and socially responsible consumers.

The OCA represents over 850,000 members, subscribers and volunteers, including several thousand businesses in the natural foods and organic marketplace. Our US and international policy board is broadly representative of the organic, family farm, environmental, and public interest community.

The Organic Consumers Association was formed in 1998 in the wake of the mass backlash by organic consumers against the U.S. Department of Agriculture's controversial proposed national regulations for organic food.

Through the OCA's SOS (Safeguard Organic Standards) Campaign, as well as the work of our allies in other organizations, the organic community over the last eight years has been able to mobilize hundreds of thousands of consumers to pressure the USDA and organic companies to preserve strict organic standards.

In its public education, network building, and mobilization activities such as its Breaking the Chains campaign, OCA works with a broad range of public interest organizations to challenge industrial agriculture, corporate globalization, and the Wal-Martization of the economy, and inspire consumers to "Buy Local, Organic, and Fair Made."


OCA's overall political program is a six-point platform.


Organic Agenda 2005-15


  • The conversion of American agriculture to at least 30% organic by the year 2015, including major reforms in agricultural subsidies and appropriations to help family farmers make the transition to organic, develop local and regional markets, and adopt renewable energy practices.

  • Fair Trade and economic justice, not so-called corporate-driven "Free Trade" as the global norm.

  • A global moratorium on genetically engineered foods and crops.

  • A phase-out of the most dangerous industrial agriculture and factory farming practices.

  • Universal health care with an emphasis on prevention, nutrition, and wellness promotion.

  • Energy independence and the conversion of US and global agriculture, transportation, and utilities to conservation practices and renewable energy.




[END QUOTE]





Saturday, September 18, 2010

Goody Buddy dog jerky



Here's a product review about Good Buddy.

It's a wheat-free dog jerky treat
made of beef, rye flour, salt.
Made in the USA.

Purchased at Naturally Yours Grocery.





My dog has eaten about half
of the bag so far.





Here's what a stick of
dog jerky looks like
(SEE PHOTO BELOW).



An elegant design,
almost poetic.

Sometimes I give him the whole stick,
other times I break it into
bite-sized pieces.

He dashes off with the full stick,
to savor it in private.




Buddy licks his chops
as he prepares himself
for the Good Buddy dog jerky.

His anticipation actually
generated its own shadow,
it was so intense.

How often do you see
a double-shadowed dog?




It was hard photographing
the product in use by
the customer, for
the customer was a blur.



The first time I gave him a stick
of Good Buddy dog jerky,
he was very enthusiastic,
almost frenzied.




Judging by this unbiased customer,
their behavioral cues
and overall demeanor,
I'd say the product
is a success.













Buy Good Buddy dog jerky
at Naturally Yours Grocery online.

Buy pet supplies at Naturally Yours Grocery online.